Two Personality Traits Predict Future Leaders

Two Character Traits Predict Future Leaders



Supply: sik-life/Pixabay

In a latest research printed in Journal of Character, Asselmann and colleagues investigated how leaders-to-be evaluate with non-leaders, along with how they alter earlier than and through their tenure.

They discovered, “leaders-to-be had been extra extraverted, open, emotionally steady, conscientious, and keen to take dangers; felt to have higher management; and trusted others greater than non-leaders.”

Plus, “whereas approaching a management place, leaders-to-be (particularly males) turned regularly extra extraverted, open, and keen to take dangers and felt additionally to have extra management over their life.” Nevertheless, “after turning into a frontrunner, they turned much less extraverted, much less keen to take dangers, and fewer conscientious, however gained vanity.”

The research is summarized under.

Investigating management improvement

Pattern: N = 33,663. The information got here from the Socio-Financial Panel Research (SOEP)—a German, nationally consultant family panel research began in 1984.


  • Management: The Worldwide Customary Classification of Occupations from 1988 (ISCO-88)
  • Character: BFI-S, a brief model of the Huge 5 Stock
  • Perceived management: Seven gadgets (e.g., “I’ve little management over the issues that occur in my life.”)
  • Shallowness: Single merchandise (“I’ve a constructive angle towards myself.”)
  • Danger willingness: One query (“How do you see your self: Are you typically an individual who may be very keen to take dangers or do you attempt to keep away from taking dangers?”)
  • Belief: Three gadgets (e.g., “On the entire, one can belief individuals.”)
  • Tendency to forgive: Tendency to Forgive Scale (e.g., “I are likely to bear grudges.”)
  • Reciprocity: The Private Norm of Reciprocity Questionnaire (e.g., “I’m going out of my means to assist any person who has been variety to me previously.”)


Researchers in contrast 2,683 people appointed to management positions in the course of the research with 30,980 who by no means had been. Of the entire (33,663), practically 50% had been girls. Of leaders, 36% had been girls, and of non-leaders, about 51%.

The principle findings are:

“Already earlier than beginning a management place, leaders had been extra extraverted, open, emotionally steady, conscientious, and keen to take dangers; felt to have higher management; and trusted others greater than non-leaders.”

Nevertheless, emergent leaders additionally skilled persona change, turning into “extra extraverted, open, and keen to take dangers, and felt additionally to have extra management whereas approaching a management place.” After being appointed chief, “they turned much less extraverted, much less keen to take dangers, and fewer conscientious however gained vanity.”

Lastly, evaluating leaders and non-leaders revealed main persona variations (particularly, being extra open and extraverted) observable lengthy earlier than they had been promoted to management positions.

The consequences of persona and surroundings on management

Why are leaders extra extraverted and open to expertise than the common particular person?

Maybe as a result of open and extraverted persons are extra more likely to get pleasure from directing others and to achieve success at it, which will increase their ambition for higher-up administration positions and boosts their probabilities of being promoted.

Moreover, these with management ambitions could select the sorts of environments or roles and tasks (e.g., main small initiatives, networking) that favor management traits. The behavioral adjustments ensuing from directing initiatives or networking could, over time, contribute to greater self-confidence, extraversion, and open-mindedness.

After beginning their place, the information confirmed, leaders maintained excessive ranges of perceived management and openness, and even skilled a lift in vanity. Nevertheless, extraversion, danger willingness, and conscientiousness declined. Why?

Possibly as a result of, on account of higher job calls for, leaders had much less vitality and time to socialize, in order that they turned extra intraverted. Moreover, a shift in focus from establishing to defending their function resulted in decreased risk-willingness.

As for decrease conscientiousness, the authors add, “leaders would possibly typically must flexibly swap between totally different initiatives, delegate duties, prioritize, and compromise. With growing management expertise, they could grow to be extra laid again, develop the next fault tolerance.”

Gender and management

There have been some gender variations within the findings. Although girls are typically extra agreeable than males, feminine leaders who had moved right into a management place had been much less agreeable than non-leaders of the identical intercourse. Why?

Character Important Reads

Presumably as a result of girls really feel, greater than males do, the strain to behave very in a different way subsequent to being promoted. In spite of everything, we generally imagine that leaders should be aggressive, assertive, and sometimes even aggressive. However these are masculine stereotypes.

Outcomes additionally confirmed that male leaders “felt to have higher management over their life than same-sex non-leaders after beginning a management place,” doubtless as a result of males “are perceived and evaluated extra positively in management positions.” Consequently, they could expertise higher perceived management.

As well as, solely male leaders-to-be turned regularly extra extraverted earlier than beginning their place.

One clarification is that the stereotypical man and chief are each anticipated to be social and outgoing, which implies that amongst leaders-to-be, males who grow to be extra extraverted are judged extra favorably than are extraverted girls.


Supply: 12222786/Pixabay


Profitable management has been related to a wide range of traits. The listing is lengthy: being formidable, articulate, genuine, caring, diplomatic, educated, energetic, moral, versatile, wholesome, progressive, insightful, clever, open, optimistic, fashionable, accountable, self-confident, self-connected, social, reliable, sensible….

How do leaders purchase these attributes?

Although leaders-to-be have a tendency to indicate sure management traits (e.g., openness, extroversion) lengthy earlier than being promoted, the above analysis reveals no one is a born chief.

In truth, most leaders-to-be bear persona adjustments throughout preparation for his or her new function and later as they acquire expertise after their appointment.

In fact, not all of the persona adjustments are everlasting. For example, will increase in extraversion and risk-willingness are sometimes short-term, returning to baseline ranges after the particular person has been promoted. The rise in openness and perceived management, nonetheless, are extra lasting.

What are the implications of the findings? For one, it is very important pay consideration to sure persona traits, significantly excessive extraversion and openness to expertise, in personnel choice.

As well as, persona change interventions could assist encourage and assist the event of traits linked to management emergence and success.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *